.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Feedback literacy of a college student in e‑learning: Development and validation of a scale
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-1-9
Abstract
Introduction. Self-assessment of feedback literacy by college students is important for the organization of e-learning. Self-assessment of feedback literacy is an educational practice of monitoring and improving the learning process through information received by the student in the context of assessment of results. Purpose setting. The problem of developing feedback literacy among college students in vocational training using Moodle is solved through formative self-assessment. The authors develop a formative self-assessment scale for feedback literacy. A survey was conducted of 88 students of Novosibirsk Aviation Technical College named after B. S. Galushchak (Novosibirsk). Methodology and methods of the study. The methodology for analyzing the results of student self-assessment of literacy in the field of feedback in e-learning is based on the use of the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) data analysis method. Results. Confirmatory factor analysis of the obtained data showed the acceptability of two structural models of the scale: one-factor and five factor, including five final indicators: «recognition of the value of feedback», «management of emotions», «ability to act», «ability to make judgment», «readiness to act». Exploratory factor analysis found that gender identity of student influences his self-assessment of literacy in the field of feedback – male students are more literate, and the gender dependence is especially strong for the indicators «emotion management» and «readiness to act.» Frequency of use of the Moodle is primarily associated with the «ability to act» indicator, while the belief in the usefulness of Moodle for learning is associated with the «ability to make judgment» indicator. Conclusion. A conclusion is made about the relevance of forming a theory and methodology for developing student feedback literacy in professional learning in digital format.
About the Authors
A. A. EgorovRussian Federation
Andrey A. Egorov – teacher
72 Krasny Ave., Novosibirsk, 630091
O. A. Chikova
Russian Federation
Olga A. Chikova – doctor of physical and mathematical sciences, professor of the department of physics
19 Mira St., Yekaterinburg, 620002
R. V. Kamenev
Russian Federation
Roman V. Kamenev – candidate of pedagogical sciences, associate professor of the department of information systems and digital education
28 Vilyuyskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630126
I. V. Sartakov
Russian Federation
Igor V. Sartakov – candidate of pedagogical sciences, associate professor of the department of information systems and digital education
28 Vilyuyskaya St., Novosibirsk, 630126
References
1. Sartakov I. V., Slaveninova N. V., Chikova O. A. Current areas of methodological support for teachers in the implementation of online learning for schoolchildren. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2023, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 178–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2023-7-2-178-186 (In Russ.).
2. Chikova O. A. Cognitive modeling as a tool for selecting massive open online courses for independent work of students of general engineering majors in physics courses. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2023, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 255–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-2-7 (In Russ.).
3. Zakharova U. S., Tanasenko K. I. MOOCs in higher education: advantages and disadvantages for teachers. Questions of Education, 2019, no. 3, pp. 176–202. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-3-176-202 (In Russ.).
4. Sorokova M. G. Electronic course as a digital educational resource of blended learning in higher education. Psychological Sciences and Education, 2020, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 36–50. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2020250104 (In Russ.).
5. Yan Z., Carless D. Self-assessment is about more than self: the enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021, vol. 47 (2), pp. 1116–1128. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431.
6. Yan Z., Brown G. T. L. A Cyclical Self-Assessment Process: Towards a Model of How Students Engage in Self-Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2016, vol. 42 (8), pp. 1247–1262. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091.
7. Carless D., Boud D. The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018, vol. 43 (8), pp. 1315–1325. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
8. Azbel A. A., Ilyushin L. S., Morozova P. A. Feedback in learning through the eyes of Russian teenagers. Questions of Education, 2021, no. 1, pp. 195–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2021-1-195-212 (In Russ.).
9. Azbel A. A., Ilyushin L. S., Kazakova E. I., Morozova P. A. Attitude of students and teachers to feedback: contradictions and development trends. Education and Science. 2022, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 76–109. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-7-76-109 (In Russ.).
10. Sutton P. Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2012, vol. 49, no 1, pp. 31–40. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2012.647781.
11. Malecka B., Boud D., Carless D. Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 2020, vol. 27 (7), pp. 908–922. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784.
12. Woitt S., Weidlich J., Jivet I., Orhan Göksün D., Drachsler H., Kalz M. Students’ feedback literacy in higher education: an initial scale validation study. Teaching in Higher Education, 2023, vol. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2263838.
13. Zhan Y. Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022, vol. 47 (7), pp. 1087–1100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001430.
14. Brooks C., Huang Y., Hattie J., Carroll A., Burton R. What Is My Next Step? School Students’ Perceptions of Feedback. Front. Educ, 2019, vol. 4, pp. 96. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00096.
15. Hattie J., Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 2007, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
16. Knaut J., Altieri M., Bach S., Strobl I., Dechant K. A Theory-Based Approach of Feedback in STACK-Based Moodle Quizzes Taking into Account Self-Regulation and Different Proficiency of Learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 2022, vol. 17 (23), pp. 38–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i23.36425.
17. Bombov A. Ya., Repkin A. S. Recommendations for generating feedback in questions like S. T. A. C.K of the Moodle system. Collection of selected articles of the TUSUR scientific session, 2019, no. 1–2, pp. 32–34. (In Russ.).
18. Yanushchik O. V., Ustinova I. G., Rozhkova S. V., Lazareva E. G. Collaboration of three Tomsk universities to create, promote and use STACK-type tasks. Modern education: integration of education, science, business and government: materials of the international scientific and methodological conference: in 2 vol. Vol. 1. Tomsk, 2022, pp. 31–35. (In Russ.).
19. Nasledov A. D. SPSS: Computer Data Analysis in Psychology and Social Sciences. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2005, 416 p. (In Russ.).
20. Nasledov A. D. SPSS IBM SPSS Statistics 20 и AMOS: professional statistical data analysis. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2013, 413 p. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
For citation: Egorov A.A., Chikova O.A., Kamenev R.V., Sartakov I.V. Feedback literacy of a college student in e‑learning: Development and validation of a scale. Professional education in the modern world. 2025;15(1):72-81. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-1-9
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
