.png)
.png)
Email this article 
On the instrumental meaning of communication
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-1-3
Abstract
Introduction. Modern research is characterized by diverse, often contradictory, interpretations of the communication process and an extraordinary variety of terminology. This applies, among other things, to the interpretation of instrumental characteristics of communication. Purpose setting. The task of the research is to consider communication as a tool of cognition and as a tool for the transformation of an integratively understood environment. Methodology and methods of the study. The article examines communications from the point of view of studying their instrumental characteristics. The authors believe that the unity and contradiction of communication with industrial relations is manifested precisely in the instrumental nature of communication. Considering communication within the framework of such a methodology, we will see the possibility and necessity of changing approaches to communication research. According to the authors, the instrumental nature of communication is best revealed in the context of the division of labor (production). Results. The authors consider the process of communication formation in a logical aspect and come from the simplest natural attitude to a specifically human one through consideration of expedient activity (labor) and its division. The approach used by the authors allows us to define the boundary of the concept of «communication», which is revealed during the transition from the consideration of the technological division of labor to the consideration of the social division of production. The authors find a historical and philosophical analogy of the described process in the early works of K. Marx, where the concept of «communication relations» was present, which later transformed into the concept of productive forces. Conclusion. Communication functions are defined as the coordination of goals (results, products) of technologically separated labor processes, which means their connection. However, when separating management into a separate work process, the goal may not be agreed with the performer. When we move to the level of the whole society, we are no longer talking about the instrumental characteristics of communications, since at the level of the whole society, the coordination or opposition of interests occurs in the form of ideology.
About the Authors
A. P. SegalRussian Federation
Alexander P. Segal – candidate of philosophical sciences, senior researcher of the department of philosophy of language and communication of the faculty of philosophy
1 Leninskiye Gory, GSP-1, Moscow, 119991
Li Wentai
Russian Federation
Li Wentai – postgraduate student at the faculty of philosophy
1 Leninskiye Gory, GSP-1, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Cooley C. H. Human nature and social order. Moscow, Idea-Press, Dom intellektual`noi` knigi Publ., 2000, 320 c. (In Russ.).
2. Hegel G. F. V. Phenomenology of the spirit. Essays in 14 vol., vol. IV. Moscow, Publishing House of Socio-economic literature, 1959, 440 p. (In Russ.).
3. Dewey D. Society and its Problems. Moscow, Idea-Press Publ., 2002, 160 p. (In Russ.).
4. Vazyulin V. A. Rational and rational thinking in the development of cognition. Marxist-Leninist dialectics. Book 3: The Dialectic of the cognitive Process. Moscow, Publishing House of MSU, 1985, pp. 173–197. (In Russ.).
5. Segal A. P. Karl Marx’s dissertation as a research text and as an object of research. Preface to K. Marx’s dissertation «The difference between the natural philosophy of Democritus and the natural philosophy of Epicurus». Moscow, Progress-Traditsija Publ., 2023, 296 p. (In Russ.).
6. Schramm W., Porter W. E. Men, Women, Messages, and Media: Understanding Human Communication. New York, Harper & Row Publ., 1982.
7. Morkovkin V. V., Bogacheva G. F., Lutskaya N. The Great Universal Dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow, AST-PRESS-SHKOLA, 2018, 1166 p. (In Russ.).
8. Bagaturia G. A. The category of «productive forces» in the theoretical legacy of Marx and Engels. Questions of philosophy, no. 9, 1981. (In Russ.).
9. Kovalzon M. Ya. Socio-philosophical meaning of the concept of «productive forces». Questions of philosophy, 1981, no. 4. (In Russ.).
10. Marakhov V. G. Dialectics of productive forces and industrial relations. Questions of philosophy. 1981. no. 4. (In Russ.)
11. Pletnikov Yu. K. On the correlation of the object of labor and productive forces. The problem of sources of development of productive forces. Questions of philosophy, 1981, no. 4. (In Russ.).
12. Pletnikov Yu. K. Afterword. to The Dialectic of Productive Forces and Industrial Relations. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1977, 222 p. (In Russ.).
13. Nureyev R. M., Orekhovsky P. A. The discussion around productive forces (The political economy of socialism: the cognitive impasse of the 1970s). Topical problems of economics and law, 2021, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 197–214. (In Russ.)
14. Hegel G. V. F. Science of Logic. Vol. 1. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1970, 501 p. (In Russ.).
15. Vazyulin V. A. Logic of history. Questions of theory and methodology. Publishing House of Moscow University, 1988, 328 p. (In Russ.).
16. K. Marx. Capital. Volume 1. Marx K., Engels F. Essays, 2nd ed., vol. 23., Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1960. (In Russ.).
17. Momdjian K. H. Social philosophy: an activity‑based approach to the analysis of man, society and history. Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow University, 2011, 510 p. (In Russ.).
18. Schutz A. The structure of everyday thinking. Translated from English by E. D. Rutkevich. Sociological essays, 1988, no. 2. (In Russ.).
19. Galperin P. Ya. A general view on the doctrine of the so-called step-by-step formation of mental actions, representations and concepts. Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 14. Psychology, 1998, no. 2, pp. 3–8. (In Russ.).
20. Bakhtin M. M. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Bakhtin M. M. Collected works, vol. 6. Moscow, Russkie slovari, Iazy`ki slavianskoi` kul`tury`Publ., 2002, 800 p. (In Russ.).
21. Bibler V. S. Thinking as creativity. (Introduction to the logic of mental dialogue). Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1975, 399 p. (In Russ.).
22. Porshnev B. F. On the beginning of human history (problems of paleopsychology). Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1974, 487 p. (In Russ.).
23. Smith A. Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2007. (In Russ.)
24. Segal A. P. Genesis and structure of everyday consciousness: dis. … candidate of philosophical sciences. Moscow, 2014, 186 p. (In Russ.).
25. Segal A. P. Who is changing the changing world? About subjects and agents of strategic communications. Artificial societies, 2019, vol. 14, no. 3. (In Russ.).
26. Drucker P. F. Management Challenges for the 21st Century. 1 ed. New York, Harper Collins Publ., 1999, 207 p. (In Russ.).
27. Drucker P. F. The practice of management. 1 ed. New York, Harper & Row Publ., 1954, 404 p. (In Russ.).
28. Marx K. Theses on Feuerbach. Works 2 ed. vol. 3. Moscow, IPL Publ., 1955, pp. 1–4. (In Russ.).
29. Vazyulin V. A. Logic of K. Marx’s «Capital». Moscow, Publishing House of Moscow University, 1968, 293 p. (In Russ.)
30. Marx K. A Preface to the Critique of Political Economy. Works, 2nd ed., vol. 13. Moscow, IPL Publ., 1959, pp. 1–167. (In Russ.).
31. Bagaturia G. A. Marx on the Prerequisites for the Communist Transformation of Society. Questions of philosophy, 1978, no. 5, pp. 3–14. (In Russ.).
32. Marx K. Economic manuscripts of 1857–1859 (The original version of Capital). Works 2 ed., vol. 46, part 1. Moscow, IPL Publ., 1968. (In Russ.).
33. Habermas J. Max Weber’s theory of rationalization. Sociological education, 2009, no. 3, pp. 37–60. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
For citation: Segal A.P., Wentai L. On the instrumental meaning of communication. Professional education in the modern world. 2025;15(1):19-29. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-1-3
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
