Humanization and sovereignization as a strategy for reform and development of Russian education. Part 2. Current trends in humanization and sovereignization of Russian education

Introduction. A necessary basis for elaboration an adequate strategy for the development of Russian education is an understanding of the depth and scale of the ongoing processes of deploying of meaningful public discourse regarding the present and future of higher education. Russian higher school can move from the paradigm of translational education to the paradigm of activity-based education based on two technological packages of higher education (activity-based and social-communicative). It is the humanitarian paradigm of human development that will provide competitive advantages to developed countries and regions.

Purpose setting. The task of forming the prerequisites for a cognitive society is highlighted as strategically important, which means increasing the intellectual potential of society, raising intellectual activity and connectedness of society. Moving towards the digital revolution, it is important to form digital literacy, the ability to learn throughout life and readiness to be included in network formats of intellectual action. Methodology and methods of the study built on the key points of humanization and sovereignization of Russian education, which naturally abandoned the Bologna system.

Results. Our study showed that the formation of new cognitive institutions is hampered by the low level of information and social connectivity of intellectuals and weak leadership in the field of knowledge production. The motivation of young people for high-quality higher education, high general and professional competence will arise if society in all its manifestations (work, leisure, politics) becomes more «smart» and intellectualized.

Conclusion. The changes currently taking place in the field of higher education are conceptualized as a multifaceted crisis, including a gap between the needs of the labor market and the professional qualifications obtained in higher education, the decline in the prestige of teaching, the need to change the paradigm of education and a number of other manifestations in the destruction of the anthropological frame-ideal of a person who defines meaning, goals of education. The ideal of a knowledgeable person ceased to be attractive, the imperative to «teach everyone everything», characteristic of the Enlightenment, lost its power, the belief in the uplifting power of education was shaken, knowledge and education became a utilitarian value, one of the goods offered to the consumer by civilization. Education has ceased to serve as a social elevator. In this situation, the future of social and cultural institutions is uncertain.

1. Rozin V. M. Analysis of the Novosibirsk project for reforming higher education. Problemy gumanizatsii i suverenizatsii rossiiskoi sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya: reformy, rezul’taty, perspektivy: sb. nauch. tr. Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 19 maya 2022 g.). Moscow, 2022, pp. 84 – 96. (In Russ.).

2. Shchedrovitsky G. P. System of pedagogical research (methodological analysis). Pedagogika i logika. Moscow, 1993, pp. 3 – 20. (In Russ.).

3. Efimov V. S. (ed.) The future of higher education in Russia: an expert view. Foresight study – 2030: anal. rep. Krasnoyarsk, Sib. feder. un-t, 2012, 182 p. (In Russ.).

4. Telegina G. V. Education at the crossroads of cultures: reform in the West and its interpretations. Tyumen, Izd-vo Tyumen. gos. un-ta, 2005, 328 p. (In Russ.).

5. Shvydkoy M. Russia did not recklessly join the Bologna process. Rossiiskaya gazeta, 2022, no. 116. URL: https://rg.ru/2022/05/31/shvydkoj-rossiia-ne-bezogliadno-vkliuchilas-v-bolonskij-process.html (accessed 25.07.2023). (In Russ.).

6. Shvydkoy M. Exit from the Bologna system will reduce the influence of the Russian Federation in the world and hit the budgets of universities. TASS: website. 2022. URL: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/14784461 (accessed 25.07.2023). Published 01.06.2022. (In Russ.).

7. Safina Z. N. Education through upbringing. Upbringing through education. Problemy gumanizatsii i suverenizatsii rossiiskoi sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya: reformy, rezul’taty, perspektivy: sb. nauch. tr. Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 19 maya 2022 g.). Moscow, 2022, pp. 97 – 103. (In Russ.).

8. On Education in the Russian Federation: Federal Law of Dec. 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ (as amended on 04.08.2023). Konsul’tantPlyus: sprav. pravovaya Sistema. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174/ (accessed 25.09.2023). (In Russ.).

9. Tarakanov A. V., Tyshkovsky A. V., Uskova D. N. On the issue of sovereignization of domestic education. Problemy gumanizatsii i suverenizatsii rossiiskoi sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya: reformy, rezul’taty, perspektivy: sb. nauch. tr. Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 19 maya 2022 g.). Moscow, 2022, pp. 31 – 39. (In Russ.).

10. Kagan M.S. Theoretical problems of philosophy. Selected works. In 2 parts. Pt. 1. Moscow, Yurait, 2018, 341 p. (In Russ.).

11. Kanapatsky A. Ya., Petrova E. S. Actualization of the problem of upbringing the spirituality of a highly qualified specialist in the educational process of higher educational institutions. Problemy gumanizatsii i suverenizatsii rossiiskoi sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya: reformy, rezul’taty, perspektivy: sb. nauch. tr. Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 19 maya 2022 g.). Moscow, 2022, pp. 65 – 69. (In Russ.).

12. Kule M. Spirituality, meaning and politicism. Chelovek i dukhovnost’. Riga, 1990. (In Russ.).

13. Murashov V. I. The crisis of the spirit and its overcoming. Shkola dukhovnosti, 2000, no. 2, pp. 68 – 84. (In Russ.).

14. Orlov V. V., Tatochenko A. L. Bologna system (process) in Russia: implementation, problems and solutions. Problemy gumanizatsii i suverenizatsii rossiiskoi sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya: reformy, rezul’taty, perspektivy: sb. nauch. tr. Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Moskva, 19 maya 2022 g.). Moscow, 2022, pp. 70 – 84. (In Russ.).

15. Salogubova N. V., Shpyg Yu. V. Unified State Examination: schools and universities – ways to improve the effectiveness of cooperation. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya, 2022, no. 1, pp. 95 – 98. (In Russ.).

16. Sholokhov A. V. The Bologna process as a generator of a permanent crisis in Russian higher education. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 2019, no. 1 – 1, pp. 87 – 90. (In Russ.).

17. Readings B. The university in ruins. Cambridge, Harvard Univ. Press, 1996, 238 p.

18. Garcia M. L., Bray O. H. Fundamentals of technology roadmapping. Albuquerque, Sandia Nat. Lab., 1997, 34 p.

19. Efimov V. S., Lapteva A. V. Practices of exploring the future: Russian foresight. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2010, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 143 – 153.

20. Popper R., Miles I. D. The FISTERA Delphi: future challenges, applications and priorities for socially beneficial information society technologies: report. Manchester, Univ. of Manchester, 2005, 158 p.

21. Barnett R. Realizing the university in an age of supercomplexity. Philadelphia, Soc. for Research into Higher Education & Open Univ. Press, 200 p.

22. Habermas J. The concept of individuality. O chelovecheskom v cheloveke. Moscow, 1991, pp. 195 – 206. (In Russ.).