Modeling of the process of development of the competence of morphogenesis for the bachelor of design

Introduction. In conditions of economic and social instability, the predictable future fluctuates from the spread of the sixth technological order to the advent of the new Middle Ages and low-tech. To feel yourself confident in the unpredictable situation, a designer has to be able to integrate professional and personal competencies into related specializations, work with tasks solved by designers in other scientific fields, have developed professional thinking, master the fundamental components of the profession, in particular, the ability to use professional tools and laws of morphogenesis to solve a variety of professional tasks. The development of competence of morphogenesis of a bachelor of design will allow him to create fundamental general professional training. Purpose setting. The purpose of the research is to develop and give a theoretical methodological substantiation of the structural and content model of the development of the competence of the morphogenesis of bachelor of design. The development of competence of morphogenesis allows us to transfer consciously the specialized competencies of a designer to the general professional field. Methodology and methods of the study. The methodological basis of the study includes practice-oriented, integrative, competence-based and personality-oriented approaches, as well as the principles of professional orientation, integrativity, personal orientation, reflexivity. As the leading research method the modelling method was used. Results. A structural-content model of the process of development of competence of morphogenesis of the bachelor of design has been created. The model makes it possible to develop the competence of morphogenesis for the bachelor of design, which is necessary to conduct professional activities in conditions of economic and social uncertainty and instability. Conclusion. The scientific novelty consists in the following: the principles and methods of development of the competence of morphogenesis are substantiated; a structural and content model has been developed; organizational and pedagogical conditions have been described. Prospects for further research are as follows: the practical implementation of the model, the development of components of the competence and the introduction of technologies for its developing in disciplines. The results can be used in the process of professional education of designers.

1. Itten J. Design and form: my preliminary course at the Bauhaus and later [Gestaltungsund Formenlehre: mein Vorkurs am Bauhaus und später]: transl. from Germ. Moscow, Nauka, 2018, 825 p. (In Russ.).

2. Druzhkova N. I. Kandinsky in the Bauhaus: theoretical foundations of artistic and pedagogical activities. Moscow, 2006, 241 p. (In Russ.).

3. Moholy-Nagy S. Moholy-Nagy experiment in totality. Cambridge, Massachusetts, M. I. T. Press, 1969, 259 p.

4. Khan-Magomedov S. O. Soviet avant-garde architecture. In 2 books. Bk. 1. Problems of form-building. Masters and trends. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1996, 709 p. (In Russ.).

5. Melodinsky D. L. School of architectural and design form-building. Moscow, Arkhitektura-S, 2004, 312 p. (In Russ.).

6. Bystrova T. Yu. Thing. Form. Style. Introduction to the philosophy of design. Yekaterinburg, Kabinetnyi uchenyi, 2017, 374 p. (In Russ.).

7. Ermilova V. V., Ermilova D. Yu. Modeling and artistic decoration of clothes: textbook. Moscow, Akademiya, 2001, 184 p. (In Russ.).

8. Mikova T. E., Chupina V. A. The competence of form-building in bachelor of design training: concept, components, levels. Sovremennaya vysshaya shkola: innovatsionnyi aspect, 2020, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 21 – 28. DOI: 10.7442/2071-9620-2020-12-3-21-28. (In Russ.).

9. Bannikova T. I. Self-educational activity as the most important pedagogical condition for the development of trans-professional competence of undergraduates-designers. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal, 2021, no. 1, pp. 94–100. (In Russ.).

10. Gropius W. The new architecture and the Bauhaus. Cambridge, Massachusetts, M. I. T. Press, 1965, 112 p.

11. Kandinsky V. Point and line to plane. Saint Petersburg, Azbuka, 2003, 240 p. (In Russ.).

12. Sádaba Fernández J. Transversality and common ground between architecture, design thinking and teaching innovation. VII Jornadas sobre Innovación Docente en Arquitectura (JIDA' 19), Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid, 14 y 15 de Noviembre de 2019. Barcelona, 2019, pp. 290 – 301. DOI: 10.5821/jida.2019.8329.

13. Brooks D. It could have been great: an examination of Kandinsky's Bauhaus paintings and the great synthesis of the arts: MA thesis, humanities. Old Dominion Univ., 2016, V, 103 p. DOI: 10.25777/qqey-w402.

14. Aronov V. R. Design in the culture of the 20th century. 1945 – 1990. Moscow, 2013, 405 p. (In Russ.).

15. Soloviev Yu. B. My life in design: design is elegance, efficiency and comfort. Moscow, Soyuz dizainerov Rossii, 2004, 251 p. (In Russ.).

16. Kubensky E. (ed.). Senezh Studio. Evgeny Rosenblum. 1964 – 1991. Moscow, Tatlin, 2019, 288 p. (In Russ.).

17. Hildebrand A. The problem of form in painting and sculpture and the collection of articles. Moscow, Logos, 2011, 134 p. (In Russ.).

18. Wölfflin H. Principles of art history. The problem of the development of style in later art. Moscow, V. Shevchuk, 2009, 344 p. (In Russ.).

19. Gabrichevsky A. G. Morphology of art. Moscow, Agraf, 2002, 864 p. (In Russ.).

20. Arnheim R. Art and visual perception. Moscow, Arkhitektura-S, 2007, 392 p. (In Russ.).

21. Chupina V. A., Mikova T. E. Form-building as a pedagogical concept. Munitsipal»noe obrazovanie: innovatsii i eksperiment, 2020, no. 6, pp. 9 – 13. (In Russ.).

22. Bezrukova V. S. Integration processes in pedagogical theory and practice. Yekaterinburg, 1994, 152 p. (In Russ.).

23. Danilyuk A. Ya. Theory of integrated education. Rostov-on-Don, RGPU Publ., 2004, 440 p. (In Russ.).

24. Chapaev N. K. Pedagogical integration: methodology, theory, technology. 2nd ed. Yekaterinburg, Izd-vo Ros. gos. prof.-ped. un-ta; Kemerovo, Izd-vo Kemerovskogo gos. prof.-ped. kolledzha, 2005, 325 p. (In Russ.).

25. Verbitsky A.A. Contextual learning: concept and content. Eksperiment i innovatsii v shkole, 2009, no. 4, pp. 8–13. (In Russ.).

26. Semper G. Prakticheskaya estetika: trans. from Germ. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1970, 320 p. (In Russ.).

27. Barkhin M. [et al.] (eds). Masters of Soviet architecture about architecture: selected excerpts from letters, articles, speeches and treatises. In 2 vol. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1975. (In Russ.).

28. Verbitsky A.A. Competence approach and theory of contextual learning: materials for the fourth meeting of the methodol. seminar Nov. 16, 2004. Moscow, Issled. tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 2004, 84 p. (In Russ.).

29. Serikov V. V. Personality-oriented approach in education: concepts and technologies. Volgograd: Peremena, 1994, 152 p. (In Russ.).

30. Bondarevskaya A. I. Cultural and educational space of the university as an environment of professional and personal self-development of students: Cand. ped. sci. diss. Rostov-on-Don, 2004, 186 p. (In Russ.).

31. Yakimanskaya I. S. Building a model of personality-oriented learning. Moscow, KSP+, 2001, 128 p. (In Russ.).

32. Chupina V. A., Fedorenko O. A. Theory and practice of professional pedagogical reflection. Yekaterinburg, Izd-vo Ros. gos. prof.-ped. un-ta, 2019, 200 p. (In Russ.).

33. Miller R., Miliband D., Hopkins D. [et al.]. Personalising education. Paris, OECD Publ., 2006, 127 p. DOI: 10.1787/9789264036604-en.

34. Zeer E. F., Krezhevskikh O. V. Conceptual and theoretical foundations of personalized education. Obrazovanie i nauka, 2022, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 11 – 39. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-4-11-39. (In Russ.).

35. Specialized activities in the field of design. OKVED kod: sait. URL: https://okvedkod.ru/okved/kod-74.1 (accessed 28.06.2023). (In Russ.).