.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Methodological principles of a two-level classification of categories of social upbringing
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2022-4-18
Abstract
Introduction. Pedagogy of social education is a new branch of pedagogy, therefore its categorical and terminological apparatus is characterized by unformedness and undevelopedness. The presence of a categorical and terminological apparatus ensures the fundamentality and solidity of science, which requires its development. A correct and scientifically substantiated categorical and terminological apparatus of social education will contribute to the further concretized and objectified search for scientific knowledge about social education.
Purpose setting. The theoretical analysis of publications indicates that systematic studies on the terminological content of pedagogy are isolated, and are more related to the historical aspects of the development of pedagogy in the analysis of individual categories/concepts, and not with its current state. It is revealed that the research of pedagogical categories and concepts is actively conducted in new branches of pedagogical science. Systematic studies of the categorical and terminological apparatus of social education are not carried out either in Russia or abroad. The purpose of the article is to search and analyze the classification of categories of social education.
Methodology and methods of the study. The study used theoretical research methods: analysis, synthesis, systematization, comparison, and classification method.
Results. A two-level classification of the scientific categories of social education has been developed, which includes categories of the first and second order.
Conclusion. Categories of the first order created by means of mechanisms for the formation of categories of classification and include a key category, synthesized, integrated and additional categories. Categories of the second order are formed according to the criterion of the basic assignment of categories. Classification of categories of the second order includes the base category, system and process categories.
About the Author
Z. A. AksyutinaRussian Federation
Zulfiya A. Aksyutina – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Social Pedagogy and Social Work
4A Partizanskaya Str., Omsk, 644 099
References
1. Subbotin A. L., Abushenko V. L., Bocharov V. A., Edelman V. A. Classification. URL: https://gtmarket.ru/concepts/6879 (accessed 01.12.2022). (In Russ.).
2. Gorsky D. P., Ivin A. D., Nikiforov A. L. Concise dictionary of logic. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1991, 208 p. (In Russ.).
3. Atlantova L. I. Formation and development of the basic concepts of Soviet pedagogy (1917-1931): Cand. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Kyiv, 1979, 19 p. (In Russ.).
4. Karapetyan I. K. Trends in the development of the categorical-conceptual apparatus of pedagogical science in Russia (1850-1930): Dr. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Moscow, 2000, 32 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kicheva I. V. Formation of the conceptual and terminological system of pedagogy in the 90s of the XX century: Dr. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Pyatigorsk, 2004, 39 p. (In Russ.).
6. Koshkina E. A. Development of the terminology of domestic didactics: Dr. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Saint Petersburg, 2016, 44 p. (In Russ.).
7. Krechko D. A. The category of «training» in domestic pedagogy in the 50s – 80s of the XX century: Cand. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Khabarovsk, 2009, 23 p. (In Russ.).
8. Serikov V. V. The category of consistency in didactics: to the development of the ideas of L. Ya. Zorina. Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy, 2019, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 16–24. (In Russ.).
9. Shapovalova V. S. Formation of the conceptual apparatus of the theory of intra-school management in Russia: Cand. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Taganrog, 2000, 21 p. (In Russ.).
10. Galaguzova M. A., Shtinova G. N. Evolution of the conceptual apparatus of pedagogy and education. Moscow, INFRA-M, 2019, 137 p. (In Russ.).
11. Dautova O. B. (ed.) Systematization of pedagogical knowledge: methodology of terminology research: [collective monograph]. Saint Petersburg, Bukvalno, 2018, 215 p. (In Russ.).
12. Robert I. V, Lavina T. A. (comp.) Explanatory dictionary of terms of the conceptual apparatus of informatization of education. Moscow, BINOM, Knowledge Laboratory, 2013, 69 p. (In Russ.).
13. Zagviazinskii V. I., Zakirova A. F. (eds.) Pedagogical dictionary. Moscow, Academia, 2008, 343 p. (In Russ.).
14. Azimov E. G., Shchukin A. N. A new dictionary of methodological terms and concepts (theory and practice of teaching languages). Moscow, IKAR, 2009, 448 p. (In Russ.).
15. Rapatsevich E. S. (comp.) Modern dictionary of pedagogy. Minsk, Sovremennoe slovo, 2001, 925 p. (In Russ.).
16. Voronin A. S. Glossary of terms in general and social pedagogy. Yekaterinburg, USTU-UPI Publ., 2006, 135 p. (In Russ.).
17. Polonsky V. M. Dictionary of education and pedagogy. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 2004, 512 p. (In Russ.).
18. Polonsky V. M. Why do we need a dictionary? Science and School, 2019, no. 1, pp. 214–226. (In Russ.).
19. Belkov S. A., Goldstein S. L., Tkachenko T. Ya. Hypertext thesaurus of system knowledge. Scientific and Technical Information. Series 2, Information Processes and Systems, 1996, no. 3, pp. 1–10. (In Russ.).
20. Abyzova E. V. Pedagogical design: concept, subject, main categories. Herald of Vyatka State University, 2010, no. 3, pp. 12–16. (In Russ.).
21. Gartliv A. V. To the question of the concept of «educative training». Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2006, no. 4, pp. 387–392. (In Russ.).
22. Kraevsky V. V. The language of pedagogy in the context of modern scientific knowledge. The language of pedagogy in the context of modern scientific knowledge: proc. of All-Russ. methodol. conf.-seminar. Volgograd [etc.], 2008, pp. 38–47. (In Russ.).
23. Orlov A. A. The specificity of modern pedagogical knowledge. Pedagogy, 2013, no. 8, pp. 3–14. (In Russ.).
24. Veidt V. P. Problems of modern pedagogical terminology. Kaliningrad Bulletin of Education, 2020, no. 4, pp. 4–14. (In Russ.).
25. Savotina N. A. Educational technologies in modern education: problems of development of the conceptual apparatus and approaches to its unification. SOTIS – Social Technologies, Research, 2015, no. 4, pp. 93–98. (In Russ.).
26. Hobmair H. (Hrsg.) Pädagogik. Köln, Bildungsverlag Eins GmbH, 2016, 504 S.
27. Sobe N. W., Kovalczyk J. A. Exploding the cube: revisiting «context» in the field of comparative education in comparative and international education: the making of a field and a vision for the future. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 2013, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 80–98.
28. Larsen M. A. New thinking in comparative education: editorial introduction. New thinking in comparative education: honoring the work of Robert Cowen. Rotterdam, Sense Publishers, 2010, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1163/9 789 460 913 051.
29. Creswell J. W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2003, 342 p.
30. Bray M. (ed.) [et. al.]. Comparative education research: approaches and methods. Hong-Kong, Univ. of Hong- Kong, 2007, XVI, 444 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6189-9.
31. Blum L. Multicultural education as values education. Harvard Projects on Schooling and Students, 2010, no. 4, pр. 1–34.
32. Gordon M. Assimilation in American life: the role of race, religion, and national origins. New York, Oxford University Press, 1964, 287 р.
33. Morley Ch. (ed.) [et. al.]. The Routledge handbook of critical pedagogies for social work. London, Routledge, 2020, 584 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351002042.
34. Smith W. L., Crowley R. M., Demoiny S. B., Cushing-Leubner J. Threshold concept pedagogy for antiracist social studies teaching. Multicultural Perspectives, 2021, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 87–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2021.1 914 047.
35. Daniela L. Concept of smart pedagogy for learning in a digital world. Epistemological approaches to digital learning in educational contexts. London, 2020, pp. 1–16. DOI: 10.4324/9 780 429 319 501-1.
36. Hidalgo À. J., Úcar X. Social pedagogy in the world today: an analysis of the academic, training and professional perspectives. The British Journal of Social Work, 2020, vol. 50, iss. 3, pp. 701–721. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcz025.
37. Winman Th. The cultural brokering power of social pedagogy in education for Roma students. Nordic Social Work Research, 2019, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 5–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1463284.
38. Sergeev N. K., Serikov V. V. Dissertation on pedagogy: the problem of science and morality. Pedagogy, 2014, no. 4, pp. 80–81. (In Russ.).
39. Zakirova A. F. Conceptual base of modern pedagogy. Pedagogy, 2001, no. 7, pp. 7–12. (In Russ.).
40. Zakirova A. F., Zheglova O. A. Methods for the formation of pedagogical concepts in the professional training of a teacher. The specificity of pedagogical education in the regions of Russia, 2015, no. 1, pp. 40–41. (In Russ.).
41. Polonsky V. M. Dynamics of development and correlation of the main concepts of pedagogy. Conceptual apparatus of pedagogy and education: a collective monograph. Yekaterinburg, 2019, pp. 94–103. (In Russ.).
42. Khudyakov V. N., Kostenok P. I. On the problem of terminological work on concepts. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2012, no. 19, pp. 125–128. (In Russ.).
43. Mamardashvili M. K. As I understand philosophy. Moscow, Progress, 1990, 414 p. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
For citation: Aksyutina Z.A. Methodological principles of a two-level classification of categories of social upbringing. Professional education in the modern world. 2022;12(4):769-778. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2022-4-18
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
