.png)
.png)
Email this article 
From "multi-vector" through the technology of "controlled chaos" to a probabilistic model of the transformation of Kazakhstan: socio-psychological analysis
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2022-3-8
Abstract
Introduction and purpose setting. The article is devoted to the disclosure of the psychological essence and content of the special operation related to the coup attempt in January 2022. The analysis of the practice of the special operation was studied in order to analyze the psychological aspects of the selected discourse, taking into account the Kazakh mentality, that actualizes the problem and reveals the novelty.
Methodology and methods of the study. The special operation fits into the new "Big Game" of actors in Central Asia and, as a psychological concept, reveals for the Republic of Kazakhstan the scenario of a hybrid technology of violent transition through "controlled chaos" to a probabilistic development model. The narrative as a methodological tool for hyperbolizing the meaning of access to the technology of destructive communications, preparation and attempted coup d’etat reveals the psychology of discourse. The conceptualized and carrying narrative of the so-called "loyal" psychological impact, taking into account the specifics of the Kazakh mentality of the introduction of controlled chaos and the subsequent dismemberment of the Republic of Kazakhstan through a special operation, sets the ways of its understanding and representation as a new type of technology. The synthesis of its fragments on the basis of psychological analysis reveals the peculiarities of the psychology of the struggle for power.
Results. The specificity of the Kazakh mentality within the framework of conflict-destructive manifestations is revealed and the probable actors of the complex complicity of the coup attempt are identified on the basis of semantic behavior. The phenomenon of «special operation» is briefly investigated, with clarification of the term and concepts of the technology of systemic destabilization of the Republic of Kazakhstan: controlled chaos, networkization, operations to achieve effect, geopolitical game, preemptive confrontation. The author reveals the forms, stages and fragments of a number of actors carried out by the special services in an attempt to withdraw the Republic of Kazakhstan from the sphere of influence of Russia. An analysis of their activities reveals a picture of internal contradictions and the goals of the special operation.
Conclusion. The results of the study contribute to the theory and practice of disrupting coups, and the material will be used in a course of lectures on this topic.
About the Author
V. V. SobolnikovRussian Federation
Valery V. Sobolnikov – Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of International Relations
17/1 Vatutina Str., Novosibirsk, 630 075
References
1. Shukurov Sh. M., Shukurov R. M. Central Asia (the experience of the history of the spirit). Moscow, Center for Strategic Planning of Orenburg Region, 2001, 256 p. (In Russ.)
2. Schatz E. Reconceptualizing clans: kinship networks and statehood in Kazakhstan. Nationalities Papers, 2005, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 231–254.
3. Nauryzbayeva Z. Nomad culture and modern mentality of Kazakhs. Kazakh Almanags, 2010, no. 1, pp.119. (In Russ.)
4. Canetti E. Mass and power. Moscow, AST, 2019, 576 p. (In Russ.)
5. Abdullin D. The European Union – Kazakhstan, CAR, strategy, tactics and development. Caspian bulletin: portal, Apr. 20 2022. URL: http://casp-geo.ru (accessed 1.03.2022). (In Russ.)
6. Kadyrzhanov R. K. Ethno-cultural symbolism and national identity of Kazakhstan. Almaty, Inst. of Philosophy, Polit. Science a. Religious Studies KN MES RK, 2014, 168 p. (In Russ.)
7. Erkibayeva G. G. Some features of the Kazakh mentality. URL: http://www.rusnauka.com/2_KAND_2013/Psihologia/7_125325.doc.htm (accessed 12.04.2022). (In Russ.)
8. Komarov O. E. Interfaith relations in modern Kazakh society (experience of sociological research in Zhambyl Region). Strategy «Kazakhstan – 2050»: social development of society: proc. of V congr. of sociologists of Kazakhstan. Almaty, 2014, pp. 288–295.
9. Sabitov Zh. M. Kazakh zhuzes and the Golden Horde clan system. Young scientist, 2015, no. 11, pp. 1165–1170. (In Russ.)
10. Bracker G. Identity of ethnic and religious consciousness. Problems of national relations in the USSR. Moscow, Progress, 1989, 280 p. (In Russ,)
11. Egenisova A. K., Yerubaeva A. R. Psychological features of the national mentality of the Kazakh people. International journal of experimental education, 2015, no. 4–2, pp. 371–376. (In Russ.)
12. Sobolnikov V. V. Mentality, mentality and ethnopsychological features of the Chineses. Moscow, Univ. textbook, INFRA-M, 2017, 160 p. (In Russ.)
13. Krkhibekov D. The mental nature of the Kazakhs. Almaty, Gylym, 2005, 256 p. (In Russ.)
14. Zhukeshev K. Mentality and national psychology. Thought, 2006, no. 6, pp. 16–21. (In Russ.)
15. Socio-political stratification of Kazakhstan society (based on results of a sociological study of CIS and IFiP research project). Almaty: KISI at President of Rep. of Kazakhstan, Inst. of Philosophy a. Polit. Science of KN MES RK, 2011, 128 p. (In Russ.)
16. Uznadze D. N. Experimental foundations of the psychology of installation. Tbilisi, Acad. sciences Gruz. SSR, 1961, 210 p. (In Russ.)
17. Masanov N. E. The nomadic civilization of the Kazakhs: the foundations of nomadic society. 2nd ed. Almaty, 2011, 740 p. (In Russ.)
18. Bekturganova B. Kazakh identity: difficulties of acquisition. Baiterek.kz. URL: http://www.baiterek.kz/index.php?journal=3&page=95 (accessed 18.04.2022). (In Russ.)
19. Shaikemelev M. S. Kazakh identity. Almaty, Inst. of Philosophy, Polit. Science a. Religious Studies of KN MES RK, 2013, 126 p. (In Russ.)
20. Kochesokov Z. H., Aripshev A. M. Factors influencing the development of religious fundamentalism at the present stage. Scientific portal of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2013, no. 3, pp. 100–106. (In Russ.)
21. Al’zhanova G. B., Nyamtsu S. I. The influence of Western culture on Kazakh society. Young scientist, 2016, no. 9, pp. 1224–1226. (In Russ.)
22. Komleva N. A. Revival of the empire «Turkish Triangle». Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University, 2021, no. 3, pp. 83–105. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2021-3-1082.
23. Miroshkina O. S. The movement of Fethullah Gulen: pros and cons. A view from the outside. Psychology, sociology and pedagogy, 2013, no. 3. URL: https://psychology.snauka.ru/2013/03/1943 (date of application: 02.01.2022). (In Russ.)
24. Myakshev A. P. Events in Alma-Ata in December 1986: the first ultimatum of national elites to the center. Bulletin of Saratov University. New series. Series: History. International relationships, 2018, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 432–439. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-4907-2018-18-4-432-439.
25. Sarbin T. R. Narrative as a basic metaphor for psychology. Postnonclassical psychology, 2004, pp. 6–28. (In Russ.)
26. Ponomareva E. G. Modernity: the secret of political coups. De Aenigmate / On the secret. Moscow, 2017. pp.461–520. (In Russ.)
27. Insebayeva S. The idea of a nation: identity, nation-building and foreign policy in Kazakhstan. CAP Central Asia Program, 2016, CAP pap. 175, pp. 1–12. URL: https://centralasiaprogram.org/imagining-nation-identity-nation-building-foreign-policy-kazakhstan (accessed 12.03.2022).
28. Olcott M. Islam and fundamentalism in independent Central Asia. Conflicting legacies. London, 1995, pp. 2–21.
Supplementary files
For citation: Sobolnikov V.V. From "multi-vector" through the technology of "controlled chaos" to a probabilistic model of the transformation of Kazakhstan: socio-psychological analysis. Professional education in the modern world. 2022;12(3):457–470. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2022-3-8
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
